Tuesday, July 17, 2007
Thursday, June 7, 2007
Tuesday, May 22, 2007
Oscar Charleston
“Charleston could hit that ball a mile,” Dizzy Dean said. “He didn’t have a weakness. When he came up, we just threw it and hoped like hell he wouldn’t get a hold of one and send it out of the park.”
- 1896 - Oscar Charleston was born in Indianapolis.
- 1910 - Charleston joined the army when he was 14 or 15. Stationed in the Philippines, Charleston got a chance to play baseball and run track. (Records show he ran the 220-yard dash in 23 seconds.)
- 1915 - Charleston returned to his hometown and joined the ABC’s as a player. He had grown up as a bat boy for the team and now had the opportunity to star with the team. With his speed, Charleston was able to cover much of the outfield. During his rookie season, Charleston and another ABC’s player got into a fight with an umpire and Charleston was held on $1,000 bond. Charleston was suspended by the team owner.
He wrote a letter to the public to apologize. “The fact is that I could not overcome my temper as often times ball players can not…. I consider the incident highly unwise.” - 1916 - Charleston was a part of the ABC’s team that beat the Chicago American Giants to capture the Black World Series.
- 1920 - The Negro National Leagues are formed and Charleston returns to the ABC’s. Chicago American Giants owner Rube Foster returned Charleston to his first team as a way of balancing the power in the league.
- 1921 - Charleston led the league in hitting (.426), triples (10), home runs (14) and stolen bases (28), collecting 79 hits in 50 games.
- 1922 - He becomes player-manager for the Harrisburg Giants of the Eastern Colored League. He continues to serve as player-manager through the 1925 season.
- 1925 - Charleston led the Eastern Colored League with a .445 batting average and helps the Giants to a second-place finish.
- 1928-1931 - In two-year stays with Hilldale and Homestead, Charleston hits .347.
- 1930 - Charleston became a member of the legendary Homestead Grays. There he teamed with such Negro League stars as Smokey Joe Williams, Judy Johnson and Josh Gibson. The Grays won a 10-game championship series with the Lincoln Giants. The Giants featured Chino Smith.
- 1932 - Financier Gus Greenlee raids the Grays and moves Charleston and other stars to his Pittsburgh Crawfords. Charleston becomes the manager. The independent team finished the season 99-36 record and Charleston hit .363, second on the team to Josh Gibson.
- 1933-35 - Charleston appeared in three East-West All-Star Games.
- 1935 - Charleston managed the Crawfords to a Negro National League championship over the New York Cubans.
- 1941-50 - Charleston managed the Philadelphia Stars.
- 1945 - Brooklyn Dodgers owner Branch Rickey formed the United States league as a way to evaluate black players for possible integration into Major League Baseball. Charleston signed on as a scout.
- 1954 - Charleston managed the Indianapolis Clowns to a league championship in his last season in professional baseball. In October of that year, Charleston suffered a stroke and fell down a flight of stairs. He died a few days later.
- 1976 -- Charleston was elected to the Hall of Fame by the Committee on Negro Baseball Leagues.
Thursday, May 17, 2007
Monday, May 14, 2007
Interesting
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/stats/byteam?cat=Situational&cut_type=39&conference=MLB&year=season_2007&sort=837
Tidbits
The right-hander lasted just 2 2/3 innings in his second start against New York in six days and said afterward that the Yankees hitters "had a good idea what was coming."
He also extended his streak of consecutive thefts without being caught to 43, extending his own American League record. The Major League mark is 50, set by Vince Coleman from Sept. 18, 1998, to July 26, 1999. Ichiro hasn't been caught stealing since April 19, 2006.
And who will replace the mighty Julio Mateo?
Friday, May 4, 2007
Are you ugly? It might be best that you blow yourself up.
Palestinian women who sign on to become suicide bombers often are driven by something other than a desire for vengeance against Israel. For many, terrorism offers an escape from dire circumstances -- the looming punishment for an extramarital affair, for example, or the prospect of an undesired arranged marriage.
"Palestinian women, far more than men, tend to choose self-sacrifice as an exit from personal despair," says Time's Tim McGirk. Since 2002, 88 Palestinian women have attempted suicide bombings; eight have succeeded. Like male suicide bombers, these women often are promised a special place in paradise for their martyrdom.
Many of the women are motivated like their male counterparts by a desire to inflict brutal revenge. In 2003, successful lawyer Hanadi Jaradat killed 21 Israelis and herself after Israeli soldiers raided her home and killed her brother and fiancé, both militants.
But in interviews with survivors, Israeli intelligence agents have identified some major differences between female and male suicide bombers. The women tend to be less introverted, older and better educated than the men. They also commonly receive less preparation and training for their attacks, ranging from days to weeks. That might explain why so many women backed away from pulling the trigger at the last moment. One teenager volunteered for suicide missions after she was forbidden to marry her boyfriend.
Suicide bombing can be a way to make up for social shame. Militants had convinced Wafa Samir al-Bliss that her disfiguring burn scars meant she would never marry and "was better off as a martyr." In the end, her suicide belt failed to detonate.
Palestinians in Gaza say that Reem Riyashi, who carried out a suicide bombing in 2004, had had an affair with a senior Hamas official. When her husband found out, she was reportedly offered suicide bombing as a chance to avoid the death sentence she risked if her affair became public.
Wednesday, May 2, 2007
No Satisfaction: Why WhatYou Have Is Never Enough
WALL STREET JOURNAL
Jonathan Clements
May 2, 2007; Page D1
We may have life and liberty. But the pursuit of happiness isn't going so well.
As a country, we are richer than ever. Yet surveys show that Americans are no happier than they were 30 years ago. The key problem: We aren't very good at figuring out what will make us happy.
We constantly hanker after fancier cars and fatter paychecks -- and, initially, such things boost our happiness. But the glow of satisfaction quickly fades and soon we're yearning for something else.
Similarly, we tell our friends that our kids are our greatest joy. Research, however, suggests the arrival of children lowers parents' reported happiness, as they struggle with the daily stresses involved. Which raises the obvious question: Why do we keep striving after these things? Experts offer two explanations.
- We aren't built to be happy. Rather, we are built to survive and reproduce. We wouldn't be here today if our ancestors didn't struggle mightily to protect and feed their families. The promise of happiness, meanwhile, is just a trick to jolly us along. "This is an incentive scheme for the benefit of our genes," argues Boston money manager Terry Burnham, co-author of "Mean Genes." "It's a very fundamental trick that's played on us, this lure of perpetual bliss." Don't like the idea that we're hoodwinked by some hard-wired set of ancient instincts? Blame it, instead, on societal beliefs. Working hard and raising children may not make us happier. But these beliefs keep society functioning -- and those who embrace them prosper and end up passing these values onto their children.
- We're bad at forecasting. Consider a study by academics Daniel Kahneman and David Schkade. They asked university students in the Midwest and Southern California where they thought someone like themselves would be happier -- and both groups picked California, in large part because of the better weather. Yet, when asked how satisfied they were with their own lives, both groups were equally happy.
"When you're thinking about moving to California, you're thinking about the beaches and the weather," says Mr. Schkade, a management professor at the University of California at San Diego. "But you aren't thinking about the fact that you'll still be spending a lot of time in the grocery store or doing chores. People emphasize differences that are easy to observe ahead of time and forget about the similarities."
When we predict what will make us happy, we're also influenced by how we feel today. If we buy the weekly groceries just after we've had lunch, we will shop much more selectively. The downside: A few days later, we will be staring unhappily into an empty refrigerator.
Maybe most important, we fail to anticipate how quickly we will adapt to improvements in our lives. We think everything will be wonderful when we move into the bigger house. We don't realize that, after a few months, we will take the extra space for granted.
Experience should help us avoid repeating such mistakes. But it doesn't, in part because we don't accurately recall how we really felt, says Harvard psychology professor Daniel Gilbert, author of "Stumbling on Happiness." One example: We work devilishly hard to get that next promotion, because we're sure it will leave us elated. We forget that, when we last got promoted, it was a bit of a letdown. With any luck, just knowing we are susceptible to these pitfalls will help.
But you might also try a reality check, Prof. Gilbert says. Suppose you think you will be happier if you move to a small rural town, adopt a child, or quit your job and become a high-school math teacher. Don't rely on the opinions of people who live in small towns, have adopted kids or become teachers. Instead, spend some time observing these folks -- and see whether they're happy.
Becoming a teacher "sounds quite romantic," Prof. Gilbert says. "But hanging around high-school math teachers may quickly disabuse you of that notion."
Hitchens on Tenet
http://politics.slate.msn.com/id/2165269/nav/tap1/
Monday, April 23, 2007
Monday, April 16, 2007
Hold your breath
Thursday, April 12, 2007
Thanks Bill
Wednesday, April 11, 2007
An interesing editorial.
The Trouble With Islam
By TAWFIK HAMID
April 3, 2007; Page A15
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
Not many years ago the brilliant Orientalist, Bernard Lewis, published a short history of the Islamic world's decline, entitled "What Went Wrong?" Astonishingly, there was, among many Western "progressives," a vocal dislike for the title. It is a false premise, these critics protested. They ignored Mr. Lewis's implicit statement that things have been, or could be, right.
But indeed, there is much that is clearly wrong with the Islamic world. Women are stoned to death and undergo clitorectomies. Gays hang from the gallows under the approving eyes of the proponents of Shariah, the legal code of Islam. Sunni and Shia massacre each other daily in Iraq. Palestinian mothers teach 3-year-old boys and girls the ideal of martyrdom. One would expect the orthodox Islamic establishment to evade or dismiss these complaints, but less happily, the non-Muslim priests of enlightenment in the West have come, actively and passively, to the Islamists' defense.
These "progressives" frequently cite the need to examine "root causes." In this they are correct: Terrorism is only the manifestation of a disease and not the disease itself. But the root-causes are quite different from what they think. As a former member of Jemaah Islamiya, a group led by al Qaeda's second in command, Ayman al-Zawahiri, I know firsthand that the inhumane teaching in Islamist ideology can transform a young, benevolent mind into that of a terrorist. Without confronting the ideological roots of radical Islam it will be impossible to combat it. While there are many ideological "rootlets" of Islamism, the main tap root has a name -- Salafism, or Salafi Islam, a violent, ultra-conservative version of the religion.
It is vital to grasp that traditional and even mainstream Islamic teaching accepts and promotes violence. Shariah, for example, allows apostates to be killed, permits beating women to discipline them, seeks to subjugate non-Muslims to Islam as dhimmis and justifies declaring war to do so. It exhorts good Muslims to exterminate the Jews before the "end of days." The near deafening silence of the Muslim majority against these barbaric practices is evidence enough that there is something fundamentally wrong.
The grave predicament we face in the Islamic world is the virtual lack of approved, theologically rigorous interpretations of Islam that clearly challenge the abusive aspects of Shariah. Unlike Salafism, more liberal branches of Islam, such as Sufism, typically do not provide the essential theological base to nullify the cruel proclamations of their Salafist counterparts. And so, for more than 20 years I have been developing and working to establish a theologically-rigorous Islam that teaches peace.
Yet it is ironic and discouraging that many non-Muslim, Western intellectuals -- who unceasingly claim to support human rights -- have become obstacles to reforming Islam. Political correctness among Westerners obstructs unambiguous criticism of Shariah's inhumanity. They find socioeconomic or political excuses for Islamist terrorism such as poverty, colonialism, discrimination or the existence of Israel. What incentive is there for Muslims to demand reform when Western "progressives" pave the way for Islamist barbarity? Indeed, if the problem is not one of religious beliefs, it leaves one to wonder why Christians who live among Muslims under identical circumstances refrain from contributing to wide-scale, systematic campaigns of terror.
Politicians and scholars in the West have taken up the chant that Islamic extremism is caused by the Arab-Israeli conflict. This analysis cannot convince any rational person that the Islamist murder of over 150,000 innocent people in Algeria -- which happened in the last few decades -- or their slaying of hundreds of Buddhists in Thailand, or the brutal violence between Sunni and Shia in Iraq could have anything to do with the Arab-Israeli conflict.
Western feminists duly fight in their home countries for equal pay and opportunity, but seemingly ignore, under a façade of cultural relativism, that large numbers of women in the Islamic world live under threat of beating, execution and genital mutilation, or cannot vote, drive cars and dress as they please.
The tendency of many Westerners to restrict themselves to self-criticism further obstructs reformation in Islam. Americans demonstrate against the war in Iraq, yet decline to demonstrate against the terrorists who kidnap innocent people and behead them. Similarly, after the Madrid train bombings, millions of Spanish citizens demonstrated against their separatist organization, ETA. But once the demonstrators realized that Muslims were behind the terror attacks they suspended the demonstrations. This example sent a message to radical Islamists to continue their violent methods.
Western appeasement of their Muslim communities has exacerbated the problem. During the four-month period after the publication of the Muhammad cartoons in a Danish magazine, there were comparatively few violent demonstrations by Muslims. Within a few days of the Danish magazine's formal apology, riots erupted throughout the world. The apology had been perceived by Islamists as weakness and concession.
Worst of all, perhaps, is the anti-Americanism among many Westerners. It is a resentment so strong, so deep-seated, so rooted in personal identity, that it has led many, consciously or unconsciously, to morally support America's enemies.
Progressives need to realize that radical Islam is based on an antiliberal system. They need to awaken to the inhumane policies and practices of Islamists around the world. They need to realize that Islamism spells the death of liberal values. And they must not take for granted the respect for human rights and dignity that we experience in America, and indeed, the West, today.
Well-meaning interfaith dialogues with Muslims have largely been fruitless. Participants must demand -- but so far haven't -- that Muslim organizations and scholars specifically and unambiguously denounce violent Salafi components in their mosques and in the media. Muslims who do not vocally oppose brutal Shariah decrees should not be considered "moderates."
All of this makes the efforts of Muslim reformers more difficult. When Westerners make politically-correct excuses for Islamism, it actually endangers the lives of reformers and in many cases has the effect of suppressing their voices.
Tolerance does not mean toleration of atrocities under the umbrella of relativism. It is time for all of us in the free world to face the reality of Salafi Islam or the reality of radical Islam will continue to face us.
Tuesday, April 10, 2007
Opening Day!
The Nuclear Bench
Tuesday, March 27, 2007
My Bruthaz
Baseball's Here
Opening day is around the corner, and Erin says that Carson is a bit too young to venture out to Safeco. So the little guy will have to come with me next year. I pulled out this picture of a Mets vs. Yankees "Subway Series." We bought tickets in the very last row at Shea stadium, and behind us there was nothing but a chain link fence that would let the freezing ocean winds were killing us. Brandon was so cold that he was forced to buy a Mets beanie just to avoid freezing to death. I won't talk about the Mets heartbreaking season, which still gets me choked up. Its the closest I've been to the World Series. I'll give my thoughts on the M's coming up.
Sunday, March 25, 2007
MARCH MADNESS RIVALRY!
Thursday night, the night before we had the baby, a much anticipated showdown took place between the Bellevue 8th single adult ward B-ball team, led by Tony Gibbs, versus Issaquah 3rd ward, with Tony's longtime rival Greg, aka "hook shot". You can see in this picture Greg shooting right over Tony, #45, as he stands in a stupor.
Tony was sportin' the big pipes, but unfortunately they went largely un-used, as his fear of shooting limited him to a passing-rebounding role.
B-8 ultimately won the game, the not-so-secret ingredient being a bunch of ringers they brought in from Bally's athletic club. Thanks to my sweetheart Erin, who cheered (laughed) me on and took these pictures, while experiencing mild contractions, and then gave birth to Carson 12 hours later!